
Vol. 76, No. 11, November 
2003
Fully Represent Nonresident Lawyers
If nonresident members must pay the same dues and 
abide by the same rules as resident members, they deserve representation 
on the State Bar Board of Governors on the same basis. 
 
by Steve Levine & Jon 
Kingstad
Steve Levine, Georgetown 1973, assistant 
general counsel, Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, resides in 
Madison.
Jon Kingstad, Marquette 1975, is an attorney 
in private practice in Minnesota. He is a member of both the Minnesota 
and Wisconsin bars and resides in Afton, Minn.
 
Something is wrong with the State Bar Board of Governors. A 
significant segment of Bar membership - a group that pays full dues and 
is required to meet all other Bar obligations - is vastly 
underrepresented on the State Bar's governing board. Nonresident 
lawyers1 make up 23 percent of the Bar's 
active membership but are allotted only three seats on the Board of 
Governors - compared to 34 seats for in-state district representatives. 
If board positions were allocated to nonresident members on the same 
per-lawyer basis as in-state members, there would be at least 10 
nonresident members on the Board of Governors. Next year the board will 
have an opportunity to correct this injustice.
Of a total membership of 17,000-plus active lawyers, there are almost 
4,000 nonresident active Bar members. While nonresident active Bar 
members reside all over the country, about 2,100 reside in adjoining 
states. A number of nonresident Bar members are licensed both in 
Wisconsin and in the states where they reside. Some live in other states 
and have offices in Wisconsin; others live in Wisconsin and have offices 
in other states.
As lawyers licensed to practice in Wisconsin, active nonresident 
lawyers are subject to the same obligations as in-state practitioners. 
They must pay full Bar dues as well as the Client Security Fund 
assessment. They are subject to the rules regarding interest on lawyer 
trust accounts, and they must comply with continuing legal education 
reporting requirements administered by the Board of Bar Examiners. 
Nonresident active Bar members are significantly affected by legal 
developments in Wisconsin. However, because of limited representation on 
the Board of Governors, their ability to affect those developments is 
severely restricted.2
Most representation on the Board of Governors for in-state lawyers is 
based on residence in one of 16 State Bar districts. At the Bar's last 
redistricting in 1995, each district was allocated one representative 
for approximately each 350 active lawyers residing in that district. As 
a result, of the total 16 Bar districts, 13 have one representative 
each, one has 13 representatives (Milwaukee County), one has six 
representatives (Dane County), and one has two representatives (Waukesha 
County).3
The board is also comprised of "representatives" from other groups 
without regard to residence. In addition to board members elected from 
each district, a number of "representatives" of various groups are given 
a vote on the Board of Governors - such as the Government Lawyers, 
Senior Lawyers, and Young Lawyers Divisions, and three nonlawyer 
members. Nonresident lawyers had no representation on the board until 
1981, when the Nonresident Lawyers Division was established and was 
allocated one board representative. This number was increased to three 
in 1986.4 Including the district governors, 
representatives, and State Bar officers, the board is composed of 49 
voting members.
Nonresident lawyers are the only group that is underrepresented on 
the Board of Governors. While members of such groups as the Young 
Lawyers and Senior Lawyers divisions are represented by both their 
district governors and their group representatives, nonresident lawyers 
- with just three representatives - are vastly underrepresented on the 
board when representation is considered on a per lawyer basis. The 77 
percent of the Bar's active membership represented by in-state district 
governors is allocated 34 votes, while the remaining 23 percent of the 
Bar's active membership - that segment composed of nonresident lawyers - 
is allocated only three votes. Something is rotten in River City.
But if nonresident lawyers live outside Wisconsin and aren't 
interested in State Bar activities, why should they be allocated 
representation on the same basis as in-state lawyers? First, since 
nonresidents pay the same Bar dues as residents, they should be accorded 
representation on the same basis. Equal obligations deserve equal 
representation. As the great Wisconsin lawyer Patrick Henry once 
proclaimed, "No bar dues without equal representation!"
Second, a large segment of the Bar's active nonresident members - 
more than 2,100 - reside in states adjacent to Wisconsin and are 
interested in the State Bar of Wisconsin and its affairs. Some 
nonresident members have offices just a stone's throw from the border 
and regularly serve clients in Wisconsin and Wisconsin courts. These 
members are "Wisconsin lawyers" just as much as lawyers located in 
Wisconsin.
And even those active nonresident Bar members who live in far-away 
states can be significantly affected by in-state legal developments. 
Right now a State Bar committee is considering methods to make CLE 
compliance and reporting less onerous for nonresident Bar members. 
Although the Bar is addressing this important problem unique to 
nonresident members, progress has been slow. Nonresident members might 
expect higher priority for their problems with greater representation on 
the Board of Governors.
There might be problems with deciding how representation of 
nonresident lawyers is to be weighted or allocated or how nonresidents 
are to attend board meetings. But whatever the problems, the bottom line 
is that active nonresident members of the State Bar pay the same dues as 
active resident members and deserve board representation on the same 
basis. By Jan. 1, 2005, the Board of Governors is required to present to 
the supreme court its regular 10-year redistricting plan - a plan that 
is supposed to adjust State Bar districts in light of shifts in lawyer 
population.5 Next year's plan should also 
adjust board membership to provide equal per-lawyer representation for 
nonresident members. The time to begin considering this process is 
now.
Endnotes
1"Nonresident lawyer" is determined 
by where an attorney's office is located. An attorney whose home is 
located out-of-state but whose office is located in-state would be able 
to vote for candidates in one of the 16 in-state Bar districts. An 
attorney whose home is located in Wisconsin but whose office is located 
in another state is a "nonresident" lawyer. See SCR 
10.05(3).
2Nonresident lawyers also are 
precluded by SCR 10.04(1) from serving as State Bar officers, including 
president, chair of the board, secretary, or treasurer. This restriction 
also is unfair and should be removed. The payment of full Bar dues 
should entitle a member to all rights of a Bar member, including the 
right to be a State Bar officer.
3See SCR 10.05(2).
4See In the Matter of 
the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: Regulation of the State Bar, SCR 
10.05(1), supreme court order dated Feb. 21, 1986.
5The redistricting plan is required 
by SCR 10.05(2)(c).
Wisconsin 
Lawyer