President's Perspective
How Can We Complain If We're Not Involved?
By Steven R. 
Sorenson
 1) A person engaged in an occupation 
requiring training and specialized study and carrying a certain social 
prestige demanding a reverence to a line of conduct as defined by others 
engaged in the same vocational activity.
 1) A person engaged in an occupation 
requiring training and specialized study and carrying a certain social 
prestige demanding a reverence to a line of conduct as defined by others 
engaged in the same vocational activity.
 2) A person who by virtue of 
their learned position carries a responsibility to establish standards 
of behavior and community involvement, including the duty to train, 
educate and provide a higher standard of ethical behavior.
2) A person who by virtue of 
their learned position carries a responsibility to establish standards 
of behavior and community involvement, including the duty to train, 
educate and provide a higher standard of ethical behavior.
The above is a distillation of several definitions for the word 
"professional." These definitions often refer to the legal profession as 
an example of a professional. The legal community has become the 
standard bearer of the term. Since the mid-1980s the State Bar of 
Wisconsin has given special attention to the duties and responsibilities 
each of us holds as a member of a learned profession. A massive effort 
has been undertaken to improve the lawyer's image. Today's practitioner 
must set an example for the rest of society. The modern lawyer must 
define by word and action acceptable and unacceptable behavior - from 
both a courtesy and ethical perspective.
More than 400 young men and women have joined the Wisconsin legal 
community this summer. Each took an oath to maintain the high standards 
ascribed to the profession. Each pledged to work within their community 
and profession to foster an environment conducive to high standards of 
courtesy and ethical behavior. Each also left the Wisconsin Supreme 
Court chamber to seek employment, to hang out a shingle or to continue 
their educational pursuits. The questions are: Did they take with them 
their commitment? Did they find a similar commitment in the firm where 
they accepted employment? Were they encouraged by the governmental 
agency where they now practice? Did they find judges and other court 
personnel supportive of their efforts to maintain high ethical 
standards? Or, succinctly, do we as a community provide fertile soil for 
the growth of these young people into perennial true 
"professionals"?
Are we committing ourselves, our law firms and our professional 
associations to the goal of weaving civility, ethical behavior and 
mutual respect into our everyday lives? Read Wisconsin Lawyer, 
the ABA Journal, Lawyers Weekly or American 
Lawyer with an eye toward their commitment to maintaining the image 
of professionalism. Attend a CLE seminar, listen to a teleconference, 
read a legal treatise, and ask yourself, "What is said regarding 
professionalism? Where is the emphasis?" Do we worry so much about our 
image, our public perception, that we forget to make professionalism a 
part of our everyday life? We may well "talk the talk" but are we 
"walking the walk"?
We are tempted to avoid participation in our community and our 
professional associations. The demand to maintain appropriate levels of 
billable hours permits some of us to rank hours higher on our personal 
list of priorities than professionalism. The rewards for winning and 
shrewd play often must be hurdled before civility and professionalism 
become the finish line. Paying clients demand ruthless and mean 
behavior. Bookkeepers and accountants remind us that pro bono service is 
an expensive cost of doing business rather than a professional duty. 
Marketing consultants advise us that donated legal services are 
acceptable only as part of a marketing effort rather than a maintenance 
of professionalism. Partners have done their "time" and believe you have 
too by virtue of their contribution. Yet there are many who maintain the 
pledge to professionalism despite these odds.
This year the State Bar of Wisconsin, in cooperation with the 
Wisconsin Supreme Court, will embark upon an ambitious program to 
encourage lawyers to respect their commitment to the profession. Lawyers 
will be asked to assist their local judges and county boards in 
providing effective local courthouse volunteer programs. They will be 
asked to facilitate information delivery programs to give the public a 
means to evaluate their current situations and find appropriate 
assistance. The Wisconsin Supreme Court and Court of Appeals will open 
their doors to classes of high school civics students to better acquaint 
our future leaders with the legal process. A new legal information 
delivery system is being designed through the cooperation of the State 
Law Library, U.W. Law Library, Marquette University Law Library and the 
State Bar of Wisconsin. The goal of this combined legal network, which 
will be known as "WLIN," is to provide legal resources such as statutes, 
administrative codes, law reviews and case law to all law firms, 
university and college libraries, high school libraries and public 
libraries. Several local bar associations and other groups also are 
involved in outreach programs, such as the Dane County ADR Booklet, the 
Waukesha County mediation videotape, the La Crosse County Truancy 
Intervention Project, the Bench/Bar Committee's civility brochure, and 
the Professionalism Committee's public service announcements and lawyer 
dispute resolution program. All of these activities offer individual 
lawyers an avenue to pursue their commitment to professionalism.
Leaders of many outreach programs report that they cannot find 
sufficient numbers of lawyers to participate. Young lawyers complain 
that their firms' billing requirements leave no time, solo practitioners 
complain that their work load already exceeds the hours in a day, 
government lawyers complain that they have to take vacation or personal 
time to serve their profession, and senior lawyers assert that there are 
no programs that fit their abilities.
How can we continue to complain about the lack of professionalism in 
the practice and the public's perception of lawyers if we don't get 
personally involved? Our profession's image is cited consistently as one 
of the top concerns within the legal community today. Yet we continue to 
ascribe the problem to the other lawyer or to the profession as 
a whole.
Studies show that individual lawyers can have the most impact on 
improving the public's perception of the legal community as well as the 
lawyer's own perception of the profession. Let's start fresh. If we look 
at the profession in the same way we did on the day of our swearing in, 
we will automatically move the legal profession up the ladder of 
respect.
Remember our own clients base their opinion of other lawyers and the 
profession on our actions, comments and suggestions. The way we treat 
our clients is the way they perceive the legal profession treats the 
rest of the world.
Improving client/lawyer communications is a step we each can take to 
reestablish professionalism. Don't deny that each of us has to do our 
part. Every lawyer can improve. Practice effective listening, practice 
courtesy, practice communicating to your client respect for the 
profession. Do not criticize other lawyers or judges in front of your 
client; save those criticisms for the proper internal forums. Do not 
puff and boast in such a way that your client feels belittled or 
unimportant. Emphasize the positive.
Professionalism demands a higher standard of behavior than do ethical 
rules. Professionalism as a quality measurement has been embodied in the 
legal system throughout history. If we reflect on our historical basis, 
we find that most American statesmen were lawyers. Despite potentially 
adverse publicity, we lawyers have the professional duty to serve our 
community in leadership roles. This year the State Bar will train future 
leaders on how to effectively participate in local, state and federal 
governmental activities. If we can increase the number of lawyers 
running for office - on our county boards, in our Legislature and in 
Congress - we will increase the impact of lawyers in our 
communities.
Community service brings with it professional respect. We need to 
stop using phrases such as "pro bono" and start using words like 
"donated legal services." As lawyers we can appreciate that donated 
legal services involve more than representing the poor and the middle 
class. Donated legal services can mean assisting taxpayer groups, 
teaching in our public schools, providing counsel to flood victims, 
helping a child-care provider get started, serving as a legal counselor 
for Boys State, arbitrating a dispute between a developer and 
neighborhood association, and many other valuable but uncompensated 
activities.
Professionalism means getting involved. It means wearing your 
occupation on your shirt sleeve. It means never having to say you're 
sorry or embarrassed to be a lawyer. It means that you are part of the 
larger community. Professionalism means you will continue to make a 
difference.
Wisconsin 
Lawyer