 Wisconsin 
  Lawyer
Wisconsin 
  Lawyer
  Vol. 81, No. 2, February 
2008
Inside the Bar 
Committee Dissolution 
  When a committee no longer serves its intended purpose, it can be 
dissolved, and that's what happened to the Group and Prepaid Legal 
Services Committee.
 
by
George C. Brown,
  State Bar executive director
 
At the December 2007 meeting of the State Bar Board of Governors, 
an action took place that almost never happens in an association. A 
long-standing committee of the State 
Bar requested approval from the Board to be disbanded. It did so because 
it 
realized that it no longer performed a function useful to Wisconsin 
lawyers or the 
public.
     Back in the 1970s, a method of providing access to legal 
services spread 
from Europe to the United States and Wisconsin - group and prepaid legal 
services plans. These plans emerged largely as an employee benefit in 
unionized 
workplaces, such as automobile factories. Because there was a concern 
that some 
of these new plans might not be well run, the Wisconsin Supreme Court 
granted 
the State Bar's request to require that these plans be nonprofit, that 
they be 
registered with the State Bar, and that lawyers report annually to the 
Bar on 
their work for such plans. At that time, most plans in this state were 
being set 
up and run by Wisconsin lawyers. The Group and Prepaid Legal Services 
Committee 
was formed to review these annual filings to ensure that the lawyers 
registered 
with the plan were properly licensed and that the plan providers were 
operating 
within the law.
     As time passed, enthusiasm for these plans waned and although 
the 
committee continued to operate, its work became something of a routine 
task. In the 
early 1990s, Congress removed the pretax benefit that previously had 
been granted 
to such plans, and enthusiasm for the plans waned even further. And then 
came 
the Internet.
     The development and expansion of the Internet created the 
opportunity for 
new business models and eliminated many companies that used traditional 
methods 
to provide information. Group and prepaid legal service plans were among 
the 
businesses that underwent significant change. Many of the plans 
available to 
the public were no longer just available through the workplace. The 
Internet 
and direct marketing provided inexpensive ways for plans to sign up new 
members. For-profit plans began to be available both to lawyers as 
providers and to 
the public as potential clients. Many of these plans were headquartered 
outside Wisconsin and were not aware of the old nonprofit and 
registration 
requirements. Wisconsin lawyers who served as providers to these plans 
were unwittingly 
violating the rules simply by being a provider. Concurrently, over these 
same years, Wisconsin's consumer protection laws and their enforcement 
through 
both the Department of Justice and the Department of Agriculture, Trade, 
and 
Consumer Protection were steadily improving.
     As it became increasingly aware of these various developments, 
the 
State Bar's Group and Prepaid Legal Services Committee struggled with 
how to 
respond. Should it more proactively try to enforce rules that gave it no 
enforcement authority, actively search out these providers and educate 
them, or should 
it seek a change in the rules to accommodate the new reality of how 
lawyers 
and plans were operating? Finally, about a year ago, the committee 
stepped back 
from the details, looked at the situation from afar, reviewed the 
current 
consumer protection laws, and concluded that supreme 
court rules governing the plans were now antiquated, that there were 
sufficient consumer protection laws in place 
to protect the public, and that the rules and the work of the committee 
were 
no longer needed, were redundant, and were an unnecessary burden to 
lawyers and 
the plan providers while delivering no additional benefit to the 
consumer. 
Upon review, the Board of Governors agreed with the committee's 
assessment, as 
did the supreme court, and the rules were modified to eliminate the 
registration 
and reporting requirements. The committee no longer had a purpose, and, 
instead 
of searching for a mission where there was none, the members asked the 
Board 
of Governors to dissolve the committee.   The Board unanimously agreed, 
and 
the committee ceased to exist. 
Wisconsin 
Lawyer